The Librarians' "Crusade" for Academic Freedom

After recent events at the University of California - Davis, there's been an uproar surrounding college librarians and academic freedom. The uproar was created after a librarian in the UC system used a title for her presentation that an administrator colleague thought might be offensive: "Copy cataloging gets some respect from administrators."

Inspired in part by [the librarian's] cautionary tale, the [UC-Davis] union sought to include a provision in the new contract clarifying that librarians have academic freedom. Union representatives proposed in late April a guarantee of academic freedom to all librarians so that they could fulfill responsibilities for teaching, scholarship, and research. 

The union says negotiators for the system rejected the proposal . . . . Claire Doan, a spokeswoman, said UC policies on academic freedom "do not extend to nonfaculty academic personnel, including librarians . . . .UC negotiators said in July that academic freedom was "not a good fit" for the librarians’ unit, according to the union. They argued, the union said, that academic freedom is for instructors of record and students when they are in the classroom or conducting related research.

After the UC system said that the policies on academic freedom do not extend to librarians, [t]he librarians’ [ensuing] crusade has drawn support in the form of a petition signed by about 650 people, including librarians and faculty members from Skidmore College, in New York, to the University of Oregon to the University of West Georgia. 

It's heartwarming to see the strong support for the librarians across the country with the strongest support arguably coming from the chair of the American Association of University Professors’ committee on academic freedom and tenure. Hank Reichman wrote for the AAUP’s Academe blog that the UC negotiators "are wrong" to say their position [against academic freedom for librarians] aligns with the AAUP’s. 

The AAUP has previously said librarians and faculty members have the same professional concerns, calling academic freedom "indispensable" to librarians because they ensure the availability of information to teachers and students. "The language proposed by UC-AFT is, therefore, totally consistent with long-accepted principles in the academic and library communities, including with the principles of academic freedom as defined for over a century by the AAUP," he wrote. "The University of California is well advised to accept this sensible proposal."

In a past post, I discussed law librarian status and academic freedom. In that post, I mentioned that our lack of academic freedom is particularly difficult because we are not protected to fully engage with and advance our field. A field that is wrongly pegged as supplementary or secondary.

In the era of big-data algorithms with no accountability and the "fake news" phenomenon, librarians must tackle tough, controversial subjects that affect information. This aligns with Reichman's assessment that academic freedom is indispensable to librarians because we ensure the availability of information to teachers and students.

And while it's absolutely true that we ensure the availability of information to teachers and students, we're also engaged in our own niche field that must have the protection of academic freedom to move forward and engage in meaningful conversations.


  1. This is one of the silliest controversies I have ever read about. How in the world was the title and subject matter of the librarian's program offensive? I have worked in higher education for 24 years and this is absolute madness.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

For The Love Of Archives

US News Scholarship Impact Issues

AALL/LexisNexis Call for Papers 2019-2020 Now Open!